I would dare say even Çakır, Kuipers or so would not have given this penalty in real time. ![]() As a final remark on that scene, Irrati seems to have lost his form a bit being the unofficial "best VAR in the world", after Manchester City - Tottenham, Japan - Scotland (we will never know what he communicated to Abebe there, in his defence) and now the game last night.Īs I said last night, very forgivable perception mistake for Marie-Soleil Beaudoin - perhaps even she saw that NED defender kicked through her opponent, but it would take amazing confidence in one's perception to whistle the penalty considering the ball passed away as if a well-executed tackle. there should be works to help reduce this when working as VAR (à la flash lag effect and assistant referee). Another take home message is that we can recognise a subconscious in our mind that if nobody appeals for sth, cognitively we are less likely to compute if it's a foul, RC etc. Another example would be the potential penalty in the U21 EURO. Missed penalty at 67' should be classroom teaching example for the role of Assistant VAR, who should remain in communication with the referee when VAR is checking a situation. It would not be a big problem, if the referee arrives in the Review Area before the VAR is ready. Then the way can be used by the VAR for further analysis and some times is saved. An idea would be, that the referee already moves towards the Review Area, when there is a certain probability that an OFR will be needed. This should be also communicated to the public, who often are not aware of this aspect.ģ) Too long review processes: Not easy to improve, because correctness is more important than speed. how likely a change of the decision has to be. There must be a clear guideline, which "missed incidents" should lead to an OFR and which not, e.g. For the fourth point, the threshold for an intervention maybe has to be slightly loweredĢ) Not enough uniformity regarding "missed incidents": We sometimes get the impression, that "missed incident" is used to justify OFRs in unclear situations, but not consistently applied. And referees should listen to that - they still can keep their decision after an OFR. For the third point, VAR should be clear in the communciation, that and why they consider it a clear mistake. The first two points could be improved by VAR training and experience. the referee is too convinced by his decision However, some are missing at the moment, because: Ideally, all decisions, that are considered wrong by nearly all (say 95%) of the viewers with good refereeing knowledge should be corrected. ![]() Regarding modifications, I think, the VAR protocol and the general priniciples can remain as they are.īut I see some points for improvement in the application:ġ) Not all clear mistakes are detected. ![]() Some have reported that Systembolaget did sell a small quantity of the original 1999 batch through the Swedish alcohol stores.I agree with Player23 - correcting many errors is good, even if some errors remain unchanged or even if some corrections are doubtful. A third batch was bottled in 2015 and released in celebration of Akkurat's 20th Anniversary. ![]() In 2013, after many rumors, Soleil de Minuit was made again and again sent to Akkurat. Due to Sweden's alcohol control system, Systembolaget, the beer was not available to go. It was released to Akkurat in three sizes, all of which came with a paper wrapping the bottle. It is available in 37.5cl, 75cl, and 1.5L bottles. The process was repeated for the second batch using frozen cloudberries added to a single oak barrel. For the first batch, fresh cloudberries were added directly to the oak barrel with two year old lambic poured on top. Cantillon Soleil De Minuit is a lambic with 300 grams per liter of cloudberries added and bottled exclusively for Akkurat in Stockholm, Sweden.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |